April 22, 2008

Carrier net management vendor says P2P is more like 20% of traffic

world_web.gif When you have a small number of competitors in a business, like the US has in the broadband access business, providers tend to create artificial scarcity and ration service. It’s almost a natural law. another one of those oddly natural laws is the 80 / 20 rule. 80% of users of any product will use 20% of a resource and 20% will use 80% of a resource. I matters not if it’s free refills on coffee, or the beer that is bought and paid for by the bottle, it holds true for both. It’s also true of bandwidth usage and should be expected by providers as a normal metric of their business.

Om Malik recently interviewed Danny McPherson, CTO of Arbor Networks, a supplier of network-management and traffic-shaping tools to carriers. You would think he would naturally concur with the Comcast line that the majority of traffics is peer to peer, but his data includes some very unexpected numbers:

The P2P stats are the ones that came as a complete surprise. Like you, I have read many reports that suggest P2P applications account for the majority of the traffic on high-speed networks. But McPherson’s data suggests otherwise:

  • 20 percent of traffic is P2P applications
  • During peak-load times, 70 percent of subscribers use http while 20 percent are using P2P
  • Http still makes up the majority of the total traffic, of which 45 percent is traditional web content that includes text and images. Streaming video and audio content from services like YouTube accounts for nearly 50 percent of the http traffic. It shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone — streaming TV shows from Hulu and videos from YouTube have been on a major upswing, as noted by our colleagues over on NewTeeVee. (GigaOm)

It would seem that the 80 / 20 rule also applies to P2P traffic. As for the bandwidth “hogs”, Telcos have been building network capacity using the 80 / 20 rule since the days of the rotary telephone. The cable guys should certainly understand this as well since they’ve also been fixed line voice providers for over a decade.

Providing bandwidth becomes exponentially cheaper every year, but it does require a commitment to invest proportionally in plant and equipment to keep up with increasing demand. If you have little competition it’s easier and cheaper to create scarcity and ration. The creation of mythology like networks being overwhelmed by illicit P2P traffic is part and parcel of creating the scarcity myth.

Filed under Net Neutrality, traffic shaping by admin

Permalink Print Comment

Comments on Carrier net management vendor says P2P is more like 20% of traffic »

April 23, 2008

Dr. Dog @ 6:26 am

Two observations –

1/ Old Telco used to use a posion table to predict voice traffic patterns. New Telco, especially the Bobs from Bangalore I am afraid are not that smart. When they started development at one Fortune 20 they did no analysis. Its write code and hope it sticks. Fact it is the rare programmer than understands the difference between DS0, T1, and fiber.

2/ I find it interesting the nature of the breakdown and most of it still HTTP (as expected). But there is something that the ISP’s might be missing. Even if it is HTTP does not mean it is not more P2P-like in nature. All I have to mention is Google Gears and some light bulbs will go off.

Gears is an AJAX based interactive transaction medium, always updating on the fly changes between client and server. All you need to do is watch Google Notebook to know it is true. So in a sense Gears is a P2P-like application running under the HTTP flag.

I would hazard to say that any ‘Rich Internet Application’ is to some degree or another acting in that manner. It is the way many new web applications operate.

Leave a Comment

 

Go Daddy $14.99 SSL Sale!

 

Made with WordPress and an easy to customize WordPress theme • Bankers Hours Blue skin by Techie Coach