July 11, 2008
FCC finds Comcast network management practices violate rules
Comcast’s woes over their network management practices seem to be without end. It would help if the company would just fess up, stop it and move on, but this has not been their strategy so far.
The head of the Federal Communications Commission said Thursday he will recommend that the nation’s largest cable company be punished for violating agency principles that guarantee customers open access to the Internet.
The potentially precedent-setting move stems from a complaint against Comcast Corp. that the company had blocked Internet traffic among users of a certain type of “file sharing” software that allows them to exchange large amounts of data.
“The commission has adopted a set of principles that protects consumers access to the Internet,” FCC Chairman Kevin Martin told The Associated Press late Thursday. “We found that Comcast’s actions in this instance violated our principles.”
Martin said Comcast has “arbitrarily” blocked Internet access, regardless of the level of traffic, and failed to disclose to consumers that it was doing so. (Yahoo)
There’s a deeper problem at work in all of this. It’s the endless ongoing effort by the cable guys and telcos to artificially create bandwidth scarcity. The only real scarcity is in the capacity their last mile infrastructure, which they have continuously refused to adequately upgrade. The larger internet continues to scale up exponentially, with operating costs in a free fall moving closer to zero every day. At the risk of repeating myself: more competition in the last mile will fix the problem without FCC intervention.
Filed under Comcast, FCC, traffic shaping by admin
















Comments on FCC finds Comcast network management practices violate rules »
Dr. Dog @ 10:56 am
Yea FCC!! And it was about damn time!
As to the comment about scale on the backend. Went to a demo yesterday. I was a presentation of using virtual routers, not VLAN, to expand capacity. Come to find out in about 30% of corporate network installations the bottleneck is not the interface cards but the internal software tables and their trade offs. So what this company was showing was take a Intel Quad4 VT box, with the fastest FSB you can find and cram it full of 10Gbs eth cards then create virtual machines of 8 routers. Each router supporting its own zone with as many dedicated eth cards as practical for each zone. They then handled the boundary layer hand offs using virtual private circuits in the virtual space.
It was interesting to see a $5k off the shelf box do the work of a $30k Cisco machine.